<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tribal Bigfoot &#8211; Comments on Chapter One: &#8220;Historical Bigfoot&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bigfootsightings.org/2009/09/05/tribal-bigfoot-comments-on-chapter-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bigfootsightings.org/2009/09/05/tribal-bigfoot-comments-on-chapter-one/</link>
	<description>Bigfoot Research and Sighting Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:25:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://bigfootsightings.org/2009/09/05/tribal-bigfoot-comments-on-chapter-one/comment-page-1/#comment-10073</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigfootsightings.org/?p=1556#comment-10073</guid>
		<description>Two books I would like to recommend are:

The Psychic Sasquatch and Soloman Islands Mysteries.

&quot;If they were actually captured back then, it makes me wonder why we have such a difficult time doing the same now. Could it be that we (as a species) have learned incompetence during the last 170 years? Could television and radio waves and cell phone EMFs have affected us … and made us lazy? Yes, times have changed.. so are we capable of duplicating the captures of the past? Or, were these accounts of hairy wild man captures simply facetious? (I think not.) Another wild theory of mine is that these captured wild men were able to put the word out to others of their species through psychic means, to warn them that if they had contact with humans they could end up captured. Are Bigfoot creatures more cautious now because of what has happened in the past?&quot;

It is said that these creatures show themselves to whomever they want because they can read your thoughts and that they are psychic and telepathic. They were brought here by the star people (aliens). They also can disaapear/dematerialize into a different dimension on a wymm when they feel threatened and don&#039;t want to interact with humans. This can explain why people can&#039;t catch one or see one more than a certain period of time. Its said the CIA had caught one on different occasions but you have to read the books to find out.

Thanks,

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two books I would like to recommend are:</p>
<p>The Psychic Sasquatch and Soloman Islands Mysteries.</p>
<p>&#8220;If they were actually captured back then, it makes me wonder why we have such a difficult time doing the same now. Could it be that we (as a species) have learned incompetence during the last 170 years? Could television and radio waves and cell phone EMFs have affected us … and made us lazy? Yes, times have changed.. so are we capable of duplicating the captures of the past? Or, were these accounts of hairy wild man captures simply facetious? (I think not.) Another wild theory of mine is that these captured wild men were able to put the word out to others of their species through psychic means, to warn them that if they had contact with humans they could end up captured. Are Bigfoot creatures more cautious now because of what has happened in the past?&#8221;</p>
<p>It is said that these creatures show themselves to whomever they want because they can read your thoughts and that they are psychic and telepathic. They were brought here by the star people (aliens). They also can disaapear/dematerialize into a different dimension on a wymm when they feel threatened and don&#8217;t want to interact with humans. This can explain why people can&#8217;t catch one or see one more than a certain period of time. Its said the CIA had caught one on different occasions but you have to read the books to find out.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://bigfootsightings.org/2009/09/05/tribal-bigfoot-comments-on-chapter-one/comment-page-1/#comment-8436</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 23:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigfootsightings.org/?p=1556#comment-8436</guid>
		<description>Gary - yes, I read Peter Byrne&#039;s new article about Bob Titmus. It seems he didn&#039;t respect him as much as John Green did (you&#039;d have to read Bobbie Short&#039;s eulogy page for Bob Titmus for that.) The early days of Bigfoot research are fascinating, are they not?

I&#039;m looking forward to reading the rest of Tribal Bigfoot. David Paulides keeps my attention - I like his writing style, and what he writes about makes me think about a lot of different aspects of Bigfoot research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary &#8211; yes, I read Peter Byrne&#8217;s new article about Bob Titmus. It seems he didn&#8217;t respect him as much as John Green did (you&#8217;d have to read Bobbie Short&#8217;s eulogy page for Bob Titmus for that.) The early days of Bigfoot research are fascinating, are they not?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to reading the rest of Tribal Bigfoot. David Paulides keeps my attention &#8211; I like his writing style, and what he writes about makes me think about a lot of different aspects of Bigfoot research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary B</title>
		<link>http://bigfootsightings.org/2009/09/05/tribal-bigfoot-comments-on-chapter-one/comment-page-1/#comment-8434</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 22:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigfootsightings.org/?p=1556#comment-8434</guid>
		<description>I have read the book twice now and it has some interesting theories in it and you will be suprised about a few items in the later chapters, Linda. 

David had emailed about another project he was doing regarding one of the results in two lab reports you will read about later as i had ran across an odd bit of info regarding the Y chromosone in Native Americans and Amelogenin testing . it sounds very interesting!!

btw Linda, did you happen to read the peter byrne article about bob titmus over at bobbi short&#039;s site?

I would recommend it. you&#039;ll find it in the &quot;what&#039;s new section&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read the book twice now and it has some interesting theories in it and you will be suprised about a few items in the later chapters, Linda. </p>
<p>David had emailed about another project he was doing regarding one of the results in two lab reports you will read about later as i had ran across an odd bit of info regarding the Y chromosone in Native Americans and Amelogenin testing . it sounds very interesting!!</p>
<p>btw Linda, did you happen to read the peter byrne article about bob titmus over at bobbi short&#8217;s site?</p>
<p>I would recommend it. you&#8217;ll find it in the &#8220;what&#8217;s new section&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

