Comments on: Bigfoot Book Research vs. Bigfoot Field Research

By: Keith

Keith — Sun, 06 Jun 2010 04:30:49 +0000

I hardly think that this is an ‘either/or’ situation. Now, common sense tells you that the only way for an account to get into a book is by someone being out there and having an encounter or finding evidence, so field research is necessary. However, all this experience must be recorded so it can be analyzed & studied. The two compliment each other; they are both key components to Bigfoot research. Does anyone really think that you can have one and not the other?

By: Chris Bennett

Chris Bennett — Mon, 05 Apr 2010 02:20:39 +0000

Not an April fool’s joke Lee, April 1st is not for Bigfoot in my book, Linda, I have pics and video from March, now for April, 12 MP HD video of at least 2 creatures in a brush pile peeking above it as I walked by them on 04-02-10, Video is under analysis. We’re gonna call it the “Wack-a-mole” video. It’s taken from 15 feet away, a full facial shot on one of the creatures..in focus..oh yes..more coming as I’m in the woods daily now except for today, Easter Sunday. Sounds too good to be true I know, but wait and see what happens…we have a plan to collect concrete proof of existence, and document the creatures without harming them, but we have to get it before they move from the area. Chris B.

By: Linda Martin

Linda Martin — Mon, 05 Apr 2010 02:10:11 +0000

Fantastic project, William. We’ve looked at your site before. My partner had the same idea – looking from above. Hope you get the results you’re looking for!